Alexei Navalny understood that rage against Putin was useless. The only way he could get under Putin’s skin was to mock him. Simon Tisdall, whose recent piece in The Guardian excerpted below, brilliantly reviewed how and why Alexei Navalny was effective. In the end, it cost him his life. That price he was willing to pay, to keep alive opposition to the murderous clown’s regime. Perhaps that is how we should all be assessing and commenting on Donald Trump? Navalny understood that ridicule and satire were strategies which egomaniacs and narcissists dread. Appealing to any moral argument is useless since they have no morals. Worth reflecting on and nurturing this point of view.
“It would be comforting to think this latest atrocity will spark a popular uprising against Putin’s dictatorship and bring the toppling of the tyrant. It would be nice to think Putin will be thrown out in next month’s manipulated, one-man presidential “election”. But that is not how things work in repressive, prison-state Putin-land.
It’s easy to condemn Putin, to rant and rave against his crimes, to demand his arrest, to make him “accountable”. But that may only be done sensibly from outside the country. For Russians, it may perhaps be wiser, and safer, to follow Navalny’s sad-courageous example. Laugh at the tyrant. Mock the fool. Little Putin is a clown. He is ridiculous, absurd. The joke’s on him.”
- Simon Tisdall is the Observer’s foreign affairs commentator