Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Hannah Arendt and Trump


With apologies to the author who penned this assessment of Hannah Arendt, could not find your name again to give due credit.
Thanks to my son for bringing this marvelous philosopher back to mind. Her take on mind and matter so fits today’s political narrative. Yeah. You know who I’m talking about. Him. The Donald. The President. So divest yourself for the foreseeable future of any preconceived notion about how politics works, or how nations interact. Or for that matter, even how we fit into the dynamic. It really is a brave new world. We’re living it, creating the narrative without any familiar reference point.

It follows, for Arendt, that political philosophy has a fundamentally ambiguous role in its relation to political experience, insofar as its conceptual formulations do not simply articulate the structures of pre-reflective experience but can equally obscure them, becoming self-subsistent preconceptions which stand between philosophical inquiry and the experiences in question, distorting the phenomenal core of experience by imposing upon it the lens of its own prejudices.

Herein lies the basis of Arendt’s quarrel with Hegel and Marx, for to define politics or the unfolding of history in terms of any teleology or immanent or objective process is to deny what is central to authentic human action, namely, its capacity to initiate the wholly new, unanticipated, unexpected, unconditioned by the laws of cause and effect.

“One could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.” – Hannah Arendt, “The Origins of Totalitarianism”

Trump has pushed this approach to new extremes; even though there are more fact-checkers than ever dedicated to exposing his blatant lies, the president’s cunning tactic is to discredit these reports as coming from the established, “dishonest” media. Meanwhile, his movement’s beliefs are backed by widely available alternative sources.

Advertisements

Twitter and Trump


Were it not for the disturbing malice in President Trump’s tweets, I’d say his social media commentary is charmingly naive. I’m not sure if it is the 140 character maximum allowed by Twitter that is distorting my view, or if in fact the President’s command of English is indeed at a grade 10 schoolboy level. I lean toward the latter conclusion. When a president uses terminology like “dudes” and “bad people” it reveals a mind that simply cannot grasp a more articulate phrasing. He seems to write whatever pops into his head, without any thought as to the potential consequence or interpretation of his words. Unlike you or I, the leader of the world’s most powerful and influential country would surely understand that his thoughts and actions are subject to analysis and reprint the world over. Every city from Albacore to Zagreb will look at what he has to say, and decide how his words will impact on them. But so far, a mere 15 days into his presidency, I see a man whose actions are motivated only by some kind of petulant grievance against anybody and everybody who has wronged him. He set up to undertake certain actions a long time ago, and nothing will change his course. It’s my way or the highway is a credo that seems to govern his every move. That might be a successful strategy for Vladimir Putin, but what President Trump has not yet understood is this. He is President in a democracy! He is still answerable to the people. And even if it takes another 4 years, the people can decide at some point that his style and simplistic viewpoint is not at all representative of their wishes. Unlike his counterpart in Russia, President Trump cannot manipulate everybody around him, including his military, to either agree or be fired, or worse yet as Putin has demonstrated, be terminated, quite literally terminated. Or can he? And unless he starts to demonstrate something other than oligarchic autocratic governing, the damage he can wreak in those four years is enough to completely destabilize and ruin our world. (And yet another part of me holds out hope that he will actually effect positive change with his straight ahead, damn the torpedoes style, but that is a subject for another essay.) So Mr. President, stop the tweets. They make you look silly. The President of the United States of America does not have to resort to social media commentary to be heard. Your world is not in cyberspace, reacting to and exchanging insults with the twitter world. I understand that it is an effective way to circumvent media, but dude, it is not presidential. Be a president, not a blogger.


Sad when issues like doing the smart thing and saving your life have to be mandated by government.  Have we become so brain dead about preserving our health, that we can no longer be relied upon to make decisions about our own bodies?  Apparently so.  Perhaps it is time to push thru class action law suits against Redpath and other sugar purveyors for decades of misleading and false claims about the adverse health impacts of sugar.  We did it to tobacco.  Why not sugar?

No more refills: France makes it illegal for restaurants, schools to offer unlimited soft drinks

 


Demonstrating the incredibly powerful influence of his office, the Donald’s tweet threats about slapping tariffs on cars coming from Mexico into the USA has no doubt had a major impact on Ford Motor Co’s decision to quash development of a $1.6B manufacturing plant in northern Mexico. There go a few thousand Mexican jobs. There will be others. Many others, as US companies revisit their development plans in Mexico and shut down existing facilities to ward off the wrath of the White House and Congress and the Senate. So while the Donald tweets on about the primacy of US jobs and the need to “make America great again” you have to wonder how thoroughly he thinks these things thru. If he’s broadcasting now about the horrible impact of illegal aliens in the United States, and the loss of American jobs because of these nasty alien Mexicans, I wonder what impact closure of plants in Mexico will have, given the Donald’s fear mongering about illegals and the loss of American jobs. You think there might be a slight increase in migration from Mexico across the Rio Grande when thousands and thousands of Mexicans are thrown out of work? Oh, yeah, I forgot! The Donald is building a wall to keep them out! So he has thought this through. And he’s going to force all those unemployed Mexicans to build it, and get the Mexican government to pay for it. What a brilliant leader.


Malic acid.  Titanium dioxide.  Brilliant blue FCF.  Allura red.  Sunset yellow.  Carbon dioxide.  Carnauba wax.

Sound like ingredients in making car wax or paint.   Or perhaps some metal working industrial process to chrome plate steel.  Titanium dioxide!  Really?  I suspect  a full Hazmat suit would be recommended when handling that.   Our kids are gorging on titanium dioxide.  That can’t be good for you.  Carnauba wax?  Why not just grab a spoonful of Dad’s car wax to satisfy that sugar craving?  These are just some of the ingredients I read off candy wrappers.  Oh yeah.  The sugars.  Corn syrup.  Sugar.  Sorbitol.  Glucose.  Dextrose.  How many sugars or substitutes are out there?  The most perplexing and bizarre ingredient was carbon dioxide?  In candy!  Whoever heard of such nonsense?  CO2 in candy.  Is that not the stuff we are trying to eliminate from our atmosphere?  The ingredient that is responsible for accelerating climate change.  How on earth does CO2 have a place in candy?  Mind boggling!  Is it any wonder our kids are developing strange and never before seen health problems?   We are living in precarious times and the future does not at all seem very bright.  So before your kids get to the bottom of their pillowcase stuffed with Halloween haul, have a look at what they are ingesting.  It better blow your mind, because if it does not, it will surely blow theirs.

Syrian immigration


This intense focus on Syrian refugees is quite extraordinary. Our media is saturated with coverage, our social welfare agencies are all preparing for the influx of immigrants. Hundreds of millions of dollars is being allocated to establish support systems. Canada will also be providing psychological support to assist potential PTSD sufferers from Syria. How times have changed! When my parents fled their Baltic homelands during WW II and spent a few years in displaced persons camps (yesterday’s version of refugee camps?) prior to immigrating to Canada, they found no such help from government. They fled from horrors of war and atrocities committed by both Nazis and Communists that were surely comparable to anything suffered by today’s Syrians. The Baltic peoples established their own ethnic community networks and assisted each other. And as far as I can recall, every one of my parents’ generation found employment, bought houses with their own savings, became naturalized citizens and lived full and fruitful lives in Canada. Yes, I understand the necessity for intensive screening to ensure that not one terrorist enters our country, but is all this frenzy of activity really needed to ensure that Syrians adapt to their newly adopted homeland? How about allocating some of those hundreds of millions of dollars to our First Nations communities? They have been here for generations yet continue to be ignored by our government while struggling thru poverty and outrageous boil water advisories. Is it noble to offer such abundant assistance to strangers when your own people continue to suffer?


LCBO union head pulling back on claim wine and beer in grocery stores would increase violence against women

Vito Pilieci, Postmedia News | March 18, 2015 | Last Updated: Mar 18 9:45 AM ET

(Sixty per cent of Ontarians over the age of 18 support the idea of selling beer and wine in alternative establishments, according to an Angus Reid study commissioned by the Ontario Convenience Store Association last year.
Brent Lewin / Bloomberg Sixty per cent of Ontarians over the age of 18 support the idea of selling beer and wine in alternative establishments, according to an Angus Reid study commissioned by the Ontario Convenience Store Association last year.)

The president of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union is dialling back on a claim that allowing more stores to sell beer and wine will spur more violence against women.

However, Warren (Smokey) Thomas says he continues to believe that increasing the availability of alcohol will have repercussions the government doesn’t appear to have considered.

Last week, Thomas issued a statement saying that allowing grocery stores to sell beer could lead to more violence. “We know alcohol contributes to violence, and this makes us question Premier Kathleen Wynne’s commitment to making women in this province safe,” it said.

On Tuesday, he took a quieter tone.

“Our point was this, the more you ‘liberalize’ the sale of alcohol, the more you will increase social problems,” Thomas said. “What she (Premier Kathleen Wynne) wants to do flies in the face of what the liquor control board stands for. It then just becomes mass retailing of alcohol.”

Thomas’s initial comments, which followed a newspaper report suggesting Ontario may license as many as 300 grocery stores to sell beer and wine alongside the brewery-owned Beer Store outlets and government-owned Liquor Control Board stores that now control most alcohol sales in the province, have helped bring the booze-sale debate to a head.

Even those who work with victims of domestic violence won’t say that increasing the number of beer and wine retailers will bring more violence.

Tara Henderson, a spokeswoman for the Ottawa Rape Crisis Centre, said that while alcohol is a factor in some cases of domestic violence, she is unaware of studies linking expanded access to more abuse.

“Alcohol can be purchased from a lot of different places,” said Henderson. “I don’t see why there could be a significant increase (in violence).”

The union president says debate over his admittedly “controversial” claim has deflected attention from his key point: Why was the rumoured arrangement negotiated in secret and why does it appear to favour a handful of large corporations?

According to the Toronto Star, the government will open an auction for 300 licences to sell alcohol at grocery stores, with no one chain being allowed to own more than 25 per cent of the licences.

Thomas asked what’s to stop a large convenience store chain from outbidding the grocery chains, which would allow beer and wine to be sold at corner stores across the province — a situation the premier has objected to openly.

Thomas represents more than 5,000 employees at the province’s LCBO stores. He insisted his objections aren’t based on securing his members’ jobs, and said his members could in fact benefit from increased jobs in warehousing and logistics if more retailers are allowed.